User talk:RychenDS

This is RychenDS's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Albertus Cornelis Tuijnman (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ibjaja055 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Albertus Cornelis Tuijnman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ibjaja055 (talk) 15:41, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have added 5 sources. I hope this version is acceptable. Otherwise please advise. RychenDS (talk) 16:50, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RychenDS! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ibjaja055 (talk) 15:41, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Albertus Cornelis Tuijnman (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Monkeysmashingkeyboards was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Albertus Cornelis Tuijnman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 17:07, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I drafted the text myself but used AI as a tool for reviewing the language. RychenDS (talk) 09:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Albertus Cornelis Tuijnman (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MelbourneIdentity was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Albertus Cornelis Tuijnman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MelbourneIdentity (talk) 18:34, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Albertus Cornelis Tuijnman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Albertus Cornelis Tuijnman. Thanks! MelbourneIdentity (talk) 18:35, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. Based on a the reviewer's feedback I received on December 27 I added 3 or 4 additional independent and reliable sources to the revised version of the submission. In light of these changes, I am not sure which aspect of the draft your comment on January 1 refers to ( "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources.") - If, in addition to the sources I added to the original version, further references are still required, I would kindly appreciate if you could specify the sentence or section in question so I can address it accordingly.. Thank you and best regards. RychenDS (talk) 07:37, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Since I did add additional sources / references (see message above) I kindly ask you to provide a concrete feedback on where an additional reference is necessary. I think the text as I submitted is well documented. RychenDS (talk) 09:33, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]