User talk:RovingPersonalityConstruct

Archives

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived by if there are more than 5.

Why you delete an edit without legitimate basis

Why did you delete my edit on HQ-9? If you googled, you could find ten more source. You could add them instead of deleting the whole edit and waste my time. But I can see from your edits that you are online-fighter rather an editor. Obsessed by your political views than Wikibiryalanmakinesi (talk) 23:06, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did provide the rationale in my edit comment (see the links to the discussions of the sources your used on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard.) I. general, please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Reliable sources. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 00:16, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am familiar. You better stop editing based on your political agenda and seek the truth. People like you are everything wrong with this platform. Don't waste other editors time by baseless and ridiculous reasons. You and I both know why you deleted my edit. Wikibiryalanmakinesi (talk) 00:21, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added another source and you deleted that one as well. This alone shows you don't care about the source but you have a content. How you are a confirmed editor? Wikibiryalanmakinesi (talk) 00:27, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Neither source is reliable, as previously discussed on RSN (linked to in my edit comments); you are required to provide reliable sources for your edits (WP:BURDEN.) You may also be interested in Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth, given your earlier comment. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 00:30, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Both sources are reliable and you are taking absolute nonsense. Both sources are well known military sources and there are hundreds of sources reporting the news. There is a video of the missile system in Baki as well. I will report you. I am wondering how you are a confirmed editor while all you do is childish edit wars. I will ask my mentor to deal with you. You are definitely a huge waste of time for everyone one. Wikibiryalanmakinesi (talk) 00:37, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well didn’t you see his linked guideline? Wikipedia is not interested in what’s true, but what’s “verifiable” according to their heavily biased list of “reliable” sources. So until something is put out in trusted publications or DoD reports, which are generally very outdated, you’ll just have to contend with yourself knowing more about the state of affairs than the general public or arrogant Wikipedia editors. ~2026-12725 (talk) 15:31, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Congo (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnamese Navy Equipment

Why did you remove all of TranHoan2511's edits? The information he used comes from the Vietnamese government and Vietnamese Ministry of Defense, and it's all public information available in newspapers and on television news. It would be great if you could refrain from deleting things you might not be familiar with and try using Google to look up information. Since you're not Vietnamese, it might be best to avoid correcting the information provided by the Vietnamese Ministry of Defense regarding their equipment. Thanks! Nkhoa1333333 (talk) 02:07, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nkhoa1333333, do familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Reliable sources. WP:ARMYRECOGNITION and WP:SELFPUB are not considered reliable. Items without sources (falling under general Wikipedia:Verifiability) were also removed. If you are going to restore that content, WP:BURDEN is on you to provide acceptable sources and references. If you believe the information is from Vietnamese MoD, then add the references. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 02:50, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

there is simply no Armyrecord being cite. And if you want the information of the our Vietnamese equipment just search the name on Our MoD's newspaper: https://qpvn.vn/ Nkhoa1333333 (talk) 04:44, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Diff/1333158765 uses Army Recognition. Again, WP:BURDEN is on you if you want to re-add content that does not meet WP:VERIFY. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 07:02, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I will take care of the citation of the post. Thanks Nkhoa1333333 (talk) 07:03, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnamese Air Force

About VNH( Vietnam Helicopter Cooporation), this is a business under the Ministry of National Defence called the 18th Brigade, formerly a regiment of the Vietnam Air Force. http://vietcopter.com.vn/vi/tin-tuc/vnh-nang-dong-doi-moi-vuot-qua-thach-thuc-1411.asp http://www.vnh.com.vn/vi/gioi-thieu/lich-su-phat-trien.phpNkhoa1333333 (talk) 03:02, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide quotations from those sources that state VHC is part of the VPAF. I'm looking for evidence that it is also organizationally part of the VPAF and reports up the VPAF chain of command.

The closest I could find is this, where VHC is called "Army Corps 18" and reports to MND; no mention of the VPAF. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 05:10, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Nkhoa1333333. Forgot to notify. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 19:55, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]