User talk:Rndlptrs

June 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Watauga Lake has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Watauga Lake was changed by Rndlptrs (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.913674 on 2019-06-16T12:58:07+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:58, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use Wikipedia to promote businesses, like you did in the article Watauga Lake. Wikipedia is not a trade directory. If you want to list a company for potential customers to find, please consider alternative outlets. Thank you. Lauritz Thomsen (talk) 13:00, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Watauga Lake. Lauritz Thomsen (talk) 13:34, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Watauga Lake shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Lauritz Thomsen (talk) 15:52, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Rndlptrs reported by User:LauritzT (Result: ). Thank you. – Lauritz Thomsen (talk) 16:16, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for this edit, which a gross violation of our living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 16:27, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]