User talk:Renamed user 3d84f6afe7812bf6e47805d59c5d455f

This is Renamed user 3d84f6afe7812bf6e47805d59c5d455f's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucan, Ireland (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Lucan, Dublin instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucan, Ireland and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:11, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MarioFan08! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 08:11, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Hello, I'm JeffSpaceman. I noticed that you recently removed content from Draft:Lucan, Ireland without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JeffSpaceman (talk) 13:52, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit requests

Hello. Please don't "copy and paste" the ENTIRE content of an article as part of an edit request. As you did here and again here. And has already been noted in the response here. Per WP:MAKINGEREQ, please try to "[m]ake [edit] requests as short, well formatted, and simple as possible". With, as per the examples given on the WP:EDITREQ page, a simple statement of what you propose to change. And why. (Copy/pasting the entire content of an article on to its Talk page is not necessary or appropriate. And, quite frankly, is near impossible for anyone to review and therefore highly unlikely to result in any actual change.) Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 17:04, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Refs / Edit summaries / Talk

Hi. There are multiple reliable (and several authoritative) sources which refer to Clondalkin as a "suburban village". Including the South Dublin County Council Framework Plan for Clondalkin (2011). Which is directly linked/referenced in the lead. In terms of:

WP:VER and WP:BURDEN - If you have another reference which supports the change you want to make, then please provide it. Otherwise the existing reference doesn't support the change.
WP:BRD and WP:CON - If you have made a "bold" change, and it has been reverted, it is generally expected that you engage with other editors to discuss your proposed changes. There are multiple threads open in the related articles. And elsewhere.
WP:ES - If you are making edits, they should be explained (and ideally supported/justified) in an edit summary.

Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 11:34, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 13:54, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lucan, Dublin, you may be blocked from editing. Guliolopez (talk) 19:10, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]