Jump to content

User talk:Regressive Historian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Eton College did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

or in the visual editor:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Describe what you changed

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Janan2025 (talk) 14:47, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Regressive Historian, I just noticed another edit (on the Charlie Kirk Shooting article) where you didn't include an edit summary. We all sometimes forget to do this, I did the other day even I was adding an image to an article, but it might be becoming a pattern in your editing. Please try to keep on top of it. If you need a hand figuring out how to add edit summaries please ask. Have fun editing! Boredintheevening (talk) 20:21, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Prince Of Roblox per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Prince Of Roblox. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Izno (talk) 23:26, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]