User talk:Redoxhtml

February 2020

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:39, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Redoxhtml (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

donuteditor1234 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Unexperienced with Wikipedia, I'd like to show as a software distributor, in case I am allowed to do a technical article I'd be content.

This software exists even it is distributed as a service and propietary and there will be software distribution due to dependencies of external Liscences like GPL (EMDOSBOX for example) or Images free for commercial use or CC. What this all is about is that it exists, even it isn't that relevant and a private project. Since now I didn't earn a cent of it even beeing the main part of it.

There is a small service that offers Abandoneware like others and a software evolution that exists.

If you say that is not possible at all, I accept this without any restriction and I won't write anything about own stuff, without any interest and neutral about stuff I know and I can source if I have time for it in the future.

I hope your are fair in this aspect, I'd like to inform there is something, but if I am not allowed to do so I will comply. There won't be a problem. (And sorry for vandalism however that happened :( )

Best reguards, Paul.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:43, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you won't be permitted to edit about anything for which you have a conflict of interest, at least until you can show a significant contribution history that shows you understand guidelines and how to participate here- even then, you will only be permitted to indirectly edit about things you have a COI for, using edit requests on existing articles as Articles for Creation on new articles. What other topics do you want to edit about? 331dot (talk) 10:14, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Redoxhtml/sandbox

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Redoxhtml/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 08:40, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]