Jump to content

User talk:~delta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user is a WikiGryphon.
This user uses AntiVandal to revert vandalism
This user is a member of WikiProject Korea.
This user is a member of the Counter-Vandalism Unit.
This user is on the Wikimedia Community Discord.
This user has AWB permissions on the English Wikipedia and uses JavaScript Wiki Browser.
Die Fliege
Email this user
This user is a recent changes patroller.
This user uses RedWarn for the quickest vandalism reverts in the west (yee-haw!)
This user regularly listens to music on Spotify.
Trout this user
This user uses Twinkle to fight vandalism.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Prodraxis)

Welcome to my talk page.

Talk page stalkers are welcome - as long as they follow Wikimedia policies.
  • My pronouns are they/them.
  • If you send me a message here, I will reply here on my talk page. If I leave a message on your talk page, please reply to me there.
  • Always sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~).
  • Please assume good faith, be civil, refrain from canvassing and follow other Wikimedia policies.
  • As for contentious topics, please assume that I am aware of all of them.
  • I'd prefer to keep this talk page only for local English Wikipedia issues - if you want to leave me a message regarding something related to another project, please do it on my talk page on that project.
  • Sometimes, this page may be semiprotected due to vandalism; if it is (and you are not registered or not autoconfirmed) and you need to leave me a message, feel free to do it at User talk:~delta/Non-protected talk page.
  • Prefer to contact me privately? If so, please email me using the page linked here. I am also on the Wikimedia Discord server under the username prodraxis.

Page header

[edit]

Can you please adjust your page header? I use dark mode and it appears as dark blue on black, making it unreadable. Thanks, TheTechie[she/they] | talk? 06:52, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for the late response - I am busy in real life :( looks like Nintendofan885 (talk · contribs) took care of it. Regards ~delta {talk • cont • 🇰🇷 • 🎢} 19:23, 8 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, it still appears the same way for me... TheTechie[she/they] | talk? 21:30, 8 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mind if I try to fix it myself? TheTechie[she/they] | talk? 21:31, 8 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. ~delta {talk • cont • 🇰🇷 • 🎢} 21:31, 8 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I've fixed it. Let me know if it's too purple. TheTechie[she/they] | talk? 22:31, 8 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 February 2026

[edit]
  • Disinformation report: Epstein's obsessions
    The sex offender's attempts to whitewash Wikipedia run deeper than we first thought.
  • Crossword: Pop quiz
    Sharpen your pencil. How well do you really know Wikipedia?
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:02, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2026 March newsletter

[edit]

The first round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As some of you may have noticed, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. This point increase has been retroactively applied to all good article reviews for which competitors have claimed points in this round. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 1 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 300 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 7 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 168 good articles, 13 good-topic articles and more than 50 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 14 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 700 reviews. The tournament points table will be updated within the next few days.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 March 2026

[edit]
  • Special report: What actually happened during the Wikimedia security incident?
    A horrifying exploit took place, which could have had catastrophic and far-reaching consequences if used maliciously; instead, it seems to have happened by accident and was used for childish vandalism. How did this happen, and what did the script actually do?
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:14, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:~delta&oldid=1342671628"