Jump to content

User talk:Polygnotus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:PolygnotusTest)
Eine Treppe

RE

[edit]
Hello, Polygnotus. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#add_button_to_visual_editor.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 03:41, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 9 April 2025

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:22, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

double boom for WikiTextExpander!!

[edit]

holy heck I swear I had a dream about a script like this once. it's great! A feature request and an ask, though:

  1. Could you make it so WTE expands the entire editor if no text is selected and the shortcut is clicked twice "soon" (probably by setting a timer to revert a boolean "doublePress" to false in 4.8 seconds)?
  2. You may want to display a warning when both Alt and Shift are checked as this is the basis for WP:Access keys.

Aaron Liu (talk) 22:43, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Aaron Liu Hmmm. Gotta think about that for a second. I also have to scrape basically everything that transcludes {{shortcut}}. Polygnotus (talk) 16:51, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I did namedrop you over at User talk:Polygnotus/Scripts/WikiTextExpander.js. ;-) Polygnotus (talk) 17:18, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I didn't see that lol. Thanks! Aaron Liu (talk) 17:08, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
User:Polygnotus/shortcuts is a first step. Polygnotus (talk) 16:46, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-16

[edit]

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Weekly highlight

  • Later this week, the default thumbnail size will be increased from 220px to 250px. This changes how pages are shown in all wikis and has been requested by some communities for many years, but wasn't previously possible due to technical limitations. [1]
  • File thumbnails are now stored in discrete sizes. If a page specifies a thumbnail size that's not among the standard sizes (20, 40, 60, 120, 250, 330, 500, 960), then MediaWiki will pick the closest larger thumbnail size but will tell the browser to downscale it to the requested size. In these cases, nothing will change visually but users might load slightly larger images. If it doesn't matter which thumbnail size is used in a page, please pick one of the standard sizes to avoid the extra in-browser down-scaling step. [2][3]

Updates for editors

  • The Wikimedia Foundation are working on a system called Edge Uniques which will enable A/B testing, help protect against Distributed denial-of-service attacks (DDoS attacks), and make it easier to understand how many visitors the Wikimedia sites have. This is so that they can more efficiently build tools which help readers, and make it easier for readers to find what they are looking for.
  • To improve security for users, a small percentage of logins will now require that the account owner input a one-time password emailed to their account. It is recommended that you check that the email address on your account is set correctly, and that it has been confirmed, and that you have an email set for this purpose. [4]
  • "Are you interested in taking a short survey to improve tools used for reviewing or reverting edits on your Wiki?" This question will be asked at 7 wikis starting next week, on Recent Changes and Watchlist pages. The Moderator Tools team wants to know more about activities that involve looking at new edits made to your Wikimedia project, and determining whether they adhere to your project's policies.
  • On April 15, the full Wikidata graph will no longer be supported on query.wikidata.org. After this date, scholarly articles will be available through query-scholarly.wikidata.org, while the rest of the data hosted on Wikidata will be available through the query.wikidata.org endpoint. This is part of the scheduled split of the Wikidata Graph, which was announced in September 2024. More information is available on Wikidata.
  • The latest quarterly Wikimedia Apps Newsletter is now available. It covers updates, experiments, and improvements made to the Wikipedia mobile apps.
  • Recurrent item View all 30 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week.

Updates for technical contributors

  • The latest quarterly Technical Community Newsletter is now available. This edition includes: an invitation for tool maintainers to attend the Toolforge UI Community Feedback Session on April 15th; recent community metrics; and recent technical blog posts.
  • Recurrent item Detailed code updates later this week: MediaWiki

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

MediaWiki message delivery 00:21, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Billie Eilish discography on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Closing with clarity

[edit]

Thanks for closing the discussion with the clarity that you're censoring the discussion at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is censored. You know many people throughout history probably didn't think of their actions as censorship but it's good when people are aware and make it clear.

-

My last comment there was:

Also not every thread does have to make a concrete ideal proposal right away. I'm noticing this page may be outdated and false and am pointing it out along with explaining why. I think the situation would be or become somewhat a policy contradiction (e.g. If policy instruments adopted later contradict those adopted earlier, policy inconsistency occurs, and ineffectiveness follows.). If this policy here is important and applied, then noneditorial indiscriminate removal of AI images is not aligned with it as it is currently. I thought maybe people would actually protect, value, cherish and honor the policy and so would seek to either

  • make practices be compliant with it and/or
  • adjust it so that practices are aligned with it
  • or sth in between that I haven't thought of.

The point is that – while the section header could still be accurate as the text beneath describes how things aren't being censored – there are still text parts that (regardless whether it's classed as censorship or not) are not up-to-date anymore if what users claim is the case is true as far as I can see albeit e.g. the "usually" in should usually focus is somewhat ambiguous (but should not be this ambiguous with that bold section title).

And there was no outcome of the discussion other than those editors who watch the policy page closely and are quick to reply seem to disagree it's censorship (albeit whether or not it's censorship is tangential since the text is still inaccurate) and don't know of anything that could or should be done. Prototyperspective (talk) 12:00, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Prototyperspective Exactly! Thank you, Polygnotus (talk) 12:31, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLP and talk pages

[edit]

Figured I'd drop by and say that I continued to think about the issue of how to interpret the BLP policy in the context of talk page discussions, and I now agree that I went way overboard in saying that it was a BLPVIO to introduce any SPSs into the discussion. I now recognize that there can be good reasons for introducing them into the discussion / that doing so can be relevant to improving an article, even though they can't be used in the article itself. Hope all's well with you. FactOrOpinion (talk) 03:53, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@FactOrOpinion: Some people pretend that we are here to write an encyclopedia to teach others. In reality, most of us are here to learn (and discover and grow)! Nice work on the Deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia article! Thank you, Polygnotus (talk) 04:06, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say that I'm here for both. Re: the Abrego Garcia article, thanks, we've got a good group of editors working on it. Not sure of where you hail from, but I'm American and am deeply distressed by what the Trump Admin. is doing in so many areas. I'm contributing to a few articles, but there are so many where the content needs to be improved. FactOrOpinion (talk) 15:51, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@FactOrOpinion The damage caused by the Trump administration is also deeply distressing to us old world monkeys; especially those of us who read the news and know a bit of history. It is a chilling reminder how fragile our system is, and how "civilization" is only a thin veneer.
I do some volunteer work, but I am not ashamed to say I am mostly here to learn. I read far more than I edit. We live in interesting times. Polygnotus (talk) 23:56, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't surprise me that people are distressed outside the US, as the Trump admin. is doing so much harm internationally (to so many people in developing countries, to our relationships with allies, to the global economy, and emboldening authoritarians elsewhere). I think most people want people everywhere to be well, so even if the damage were only domestic, I'm sure that some outside the US would be concerned.
I do a fair amount of outside reading in order to figure out what content to add, and I'm a slow editor, but I try to make some headway in a few of the articles that are meaningful to me. FactOrOpinion (talk) 00:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Polygnotus&oldid=1286142628"