User talk:PleaseDon'tRevertMyEdits

Nothing can revert my edits! Yeah!

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Agustin Sepulveda Venegas 2004 Fan

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Agustin Sepulveda Venegas 2004 Fan, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Untamed1910 (talk) 23:32, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello there, welcome to Wikipedia :). Um, I'm not sure if you are joking with your username, but I wanted to let you know that you shouldn't take it personally if someone undos one of your edits. We are all trying to improve Wikipedia's articles. Sometimes a user makes a good faith edit that unintentionally deteriorates an article, in which case another editor may revert their edits. Please listen to their feedback.

Have a nice day! –The Sophocrat (talk) 23:32, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:50, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Agustin Sepulveda Venegas 2004 Fan per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Agustin Sepulveda Venegas 2004 Fan. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 23:53, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PleaseDon'tRevertMyEdits (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Even though my username says that, the information in my user page and talk page became misleading as my edits were actually reverted. This is more of an error than a trait. PleaseDon'tRevertMyEdits (talk) 23:58, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

PleaseDon'tRevertMyEdits (talk) 23:58, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]