User talk:PeReIrAnO14

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, PeReIrAnO14! I am LouriePieterse and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Lourie Pieterse 20:48, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of History of Pereira

A tag has been placed on History of Pereira, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cabe 6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 19:41, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

English

This is the English Wikipedia. Here we write in English. If you wish to conribute in Castellano, please go to the Castellano Wikipedia. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 20:17, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Liberty and Order

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Liberty and Order, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Coat of arms of Colombia. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:22, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Colombia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 23:05, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Liberty and Order

A tag has been placed on Liberty and Order requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Green Giant (talk) 23:10, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked you briefly. Please explain why you keep posting in Castillian here. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 00:28, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have also blocked the IP address you used for this edit. Are you going to explain or should we just keep blocking and protecting? — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 10:15, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Flag of Pereira

The article Flag of Pereira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable flag

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atavoidirc (talk) 16:27, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]