User talk:PMFlack
Welcome!
[edit]
Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Happy editing! Cheers, 🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 10:50, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
May 2023
[edit] This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Vinx De'Jon Parrette, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. We also do not allow unreferenced biographical material in articles, no matter how much the subject wants it. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 18:42, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
- Apologies this was my first time editing on Wikipedia for my management client. Please could you explain what was soapboxing, advertising or promotion so i can get it right next time PMFlack (talk) 18:56, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
- Practically everything you wrote (Left-hand side is the text you wrote) was promotional either directly or indirectly, and only one source was provided for any of it - and said source was the subject's own website, which cannot be used to cite any biographical claims that could reasonably be challenged. The bigger concern, however, is you admitting he's your client. You are obligated to publicly disclose this information on your userpage per Wikipedia policy or be blocked for breaching the Terms of Use. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 20:13, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Mattia Vlad Morleo (June 2)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mattia Vlad Morleo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
![]() |
Hello, PMFlack!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 10:49, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
|
June 2025
[edit]
Hello PMFlack. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Mattia Vlad Morleo, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:PMFlack. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=PMFlack|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 10:49, 2 June 2025 (UTC)