User talk:Orence66

Welcome!

Hello, Orence66, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Lowcostholidays.com, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! KuyaBriBri^Talk 13:46, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lowcostholidays.com

A tag has been placed on Lowcostholidays.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. KuyaBriBri^Talk 13:46, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Lawrence Hunt. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Count Count (talk) 09:31, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Orence66 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the tag requesting the link to be removed is correct: the website from that link no longer exists. That should not preclude me from editing the page, so please would you be able to unblock me so I can update all of the references links on this page so that they are accurate

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=the tag requesting the link to be removed is correct: the website from that link no longer exists. That should not preclude me from editing the page, so please would you be able to unblock me so I can update all of the references links on this page so that they are accurate |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=the tag requesting the link to be removed is correct: the website from that link no longer exists. That should not preclude me from editing the page, so please would you be able to unblock me so I can update all of the references links on this page so that they are accurate |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=the tag requesting the link to be removed is correct: the website from that link no longer exists. That should not preclude me from editing the page, so please would you be able to unblock me so I can update all of the references links on this page so that they are accurate |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

You took a very professional looking image of Mr. Hunt and he posed for you. What is your connection to him? 331dot (talk) 16:41, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]