User talk:Oracle55

Oracle55, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Oracle55!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:35, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss before adding...

...and you are close to breaking WP:3RR. Cheers, Λuα ^{(Operibus anteire)} 02:21, 8 March 2014 (UTC) What is it that I am breaking?[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Oracle55 reported by User:Aua (Result: ). Thank you. Λuα ^{(Operibus anteire)} 02:28, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Coffee. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 02:56, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oracle55 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Neither party did discuss these issues now allow me to discuss them on the talk page. Oracle55 (talk) 03:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 07:13, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Oracle55, you removed reliable sources from the article, inserted your own unreliable sources and inaccurate POV statements, and then proceeded to break WP:3RR. I have asked you on your talkpage and in the edit summaries (which you have shown you were able to read and reply to) to discuss on the talkpage per WP:BRD. You refused to and kept doing your own thing. Now that you are blocked, you ask for the opportunity to discuss? This is not how Wikipedia works, and just because you don't like a fact here doesn't mean you can bulldoze your way through and remove it.

Cheers, Λuα ^{(Operibus anteire)} 04:41, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@ The decliner I reviewed the guidelines you moron! Owa or whatever your name is, nothing but a typical arrogant arab stealing african history.

This is your only warning. If you make another personal attack, you risk being blocked longer or reblocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:24, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]