Jump to content

User talk:Opecuted

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


What to do?

[edit]

I don't know what to do with Jason Momoa without breaking 3RR--Opecuted (talk) 09:31, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am watching the article. In the future, edit warring may be reported to WP:ANEW. Reverting BLP violations is a specific exemption to 3RR if necessary(though a report to either ANEW or WP:BLPN can often be better). 331dot (talk) 09:42, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SelfTrouted

[edit]
a rainbow trout fish

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: This diff —Opecuted (talk) 13:15, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 December 2025

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:02, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 January 2026

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:16, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 January 2026

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:28, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A Dobos torte for you!

[edit]
7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.


To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 02:21, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you —Opecuted (talk) 15:04, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted

[edit]
a rainbow trout fish

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE ~2026-82740-3 (talk) 10:34, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 February 2026

[edit]
  • Disinformation report: Epstein's obsessions
    The sex offender's attempts to whitewash Wikipedia run deeper than we first thought.
  • Crossword: Pop quiz
    Sharpen your pencil. How well do you really know Wikipedia?
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:00, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Copypaste investigation on RIM-66 Standard

[edit]

Greetings. You opened a copypaste question on the RIM-66 missile article in January. I just dove into it and wrote up my results here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:RIM-66_Standard#Copypaste_allegation

In brief, it looks like the Wikipedia article predates the other website by around three years, according to the Wayback Machine at the Internet Archive (2008 vs 2011). The other site seems to have grabbed the 2011 Wikipedia version and then both may have been edited in a similar manner, possibly the site owner there collaborating here but I don't know (and it's not an issue). I have the links over there.

You did spot the similarity and it was a good thing to have someone investigate. I am going to remove the tag on the article as evidence seems pretty solid that it's not Wikipedia copying from the external site, but the other way around, which is technically a license violation on WP content but not worth pursuing them over it. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 09:55, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Understood and thank you —Opecuted (talk) 04:30, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Opecuted&oldid=1339561102"