User talk:Negra.perlog
| This is Negra.perlog's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Rea Nuhu (November 6)
[edit]
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rea Nuhu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Negra.perlog!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MarcGarver (talk) 18:08, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Rea Nuhu (November 11)
[edit]This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
You added some citations, but they do not appear to be reliable. Also, the formatting of these sources are a mess; too many articles have the needless "user, automatic" names or "tvklan, web".
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rea Nuhu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Hello dear Yoshiman6464.
- Thank you again for taking the time to review my draft. I appreciate your feedback and the guidance you have provided throughout this process.
- I have carefully revised the draft about Rea Nuhu, addressing the concerns you mentioned. I reorganized the references to ensure they are properly formatted, reliable, and clearly connected to the information in the article. I have also added a significant number of verifiable sources, including multiple independent references that discuss her work and public presence.
- Based on these improvements and the availability of coverage online, I believe the draft now meets the notability and sourcing requirements. Rea Nuhu has considerable visibility across various reputable platforms, and a quick search online shows consistent independent coverage of her career.
- I kindly ask if you could please take another look at the updated version of the draft. I fully respect Wikipedia’s standards and have made every effort to meet them. Your guidance has been very valuable, and I would greatly appreciate your reconsideration.
- Thank you for your time and understanding. Negra.perlog (talk) 22:20, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!
It appears you may have used a large language model (LLM), such as ChatGPT, in your edits. While LLMs are powerful, machine-generated text often contains serious flaws. They may introduce bias, errors, plagiarism, libel, or even hoaxes. Specifically asking an LLM to "write a Wikipedia article" can sometimes cause the output to be outright fabrication, complete with fictitious references. Editors must verify all LLM-generated text before using it in an article. Completely LLM-generated articles may be quickly deleted. If you are unsure about your wording, an alternative is to suggest it on the talk page for another volunteer to look at it. If you are creating a new article, you may use the Articles for Creation process to get feedback on your work.
As you get started editing Wikipedia, you may find the pages below to be helpful:
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can , and someone will be along to answer it shortly. In your messages, please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. Happy editing! Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 04:49, 2 December 2025 (UTC)