User talk:Nebonid

June 2021

Hello, I'm Elizium23. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chaldean Catholics, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Elizium23 (talk) 11:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chaldean Catholics, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 01:18, 2 June 2021 (UTC) Hello ,Elizium23. I am Nebonid.Why are you stopping me from editing this article? Why do you think my editing is destructive?Are you saying that the information I published on this page is direct?[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chaldean Catholics. Ken Tony ^{Shall we discuss?} 17:22, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chaldean Catholics. Elizium23 (talk) 13:23, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chaldean Catholics. Elizium23 (talk) 18:59, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Nebonid reported by User:Elizium23 (Result: ). Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 10:38, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Chaldean Catholics

Hello Nebonid. You've been warned for edit warring per a complaint at the noticeboard. You may be blocked if you revert the article again without getting a prior consensus in your favor on the article talk page. Let me know if you have any questions. EdJohnston (talk) 02:15, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Coat-of-arms-of-the-chaldean-bishop-emanuel-shaleta-of-san-diego-2017 orig.png

Thanks for uploading File:Coat-of-arms-of-the-chaldean-bishop-emanuel-shaleta-of-san-diego-2017 orig.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:00, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Seddon ^talk 22:57, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]