User talk:Nayan.UpRaqx

This is Nayan.UpRaqx's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Nayan.UpRaqx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because my IP address was recently used by "Nayan.UpRaqx". The reason given for Nayan.UpRaqx's block is: "Sock puppetry, likely sock of Nayanmist".

Blocking administrator: ‪DoubleGrazing‬ (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Not autoblocked. You are blocked directly for sockpuppeting. Make your unblock request with your original account. You'll want to drop your claim that you were not using multiple accounts for deception, disruption, or abuse. You were clearly planning on continuing to violate our policies in exactly the same manner as Nayanmist was blocked for. Yamla (talk) 21:10, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I acknowledge that both "Nayanmist" and "Nayan.UpRaqx" are my accounts. I did not intend to violate Wikipedia's policies, and I was not using multiple accounts for deception, disruption, or abuse.

The reason I created a second account was i have forgot credentials, wanted a fresh start, had issues with the previous account so please guide me. I now understand that having multiple accounts can be seen as sock puppetry.

I assure you that I will follow Wikipedia’s one-account rule moving forward. I am willing to follow Wikipedia's guidance on merging accounts or continuing with only one account. Please guide me.

I respectfully request an unblock and sincerely apologize for any misunderstanding. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Narayana Business School (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Narayana Business School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:17, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nayan.UpRaqx! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:17, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Narayana Business School

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Narayana Business School, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:18, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:26, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I acknowledge that both "Nayanmist" and "Nayan.UpRaqx" are my accounts. I did not intend to violate Wikipedia's policies, and I was not using multiple accounts for deception, disruption, or abuse.

The reason I created a second account was i have forgot credentials, wanted a fresh start, had issues with the previous account so please guide me. I now understand that having multiple accounts can be seen as sock puppetry.

I assure you that I will follow Wikipedia’s one-account rule moving forward. I am willing to follow Wikipedia's guidance on merging accounts or continuing with only one account. Please guide me.

I respectfully request an unblock and sincerely apologize for any misunderstanding. Thank you for your time and consideration. Nayan.UpRaqx (talk) 20:17, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]