User talk:Nathanielpc

January 2020

Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Erling Braut Håland have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 23:59, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. S0091 (talk) 00:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Albert Sambi Lokonga have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Albert Sambi Lokonga was changed by Nathanielpc (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872722 on 2023-02-21T11:30:42+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page Ternana Calcio, but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Nsevs • Talk 05:40, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nathanielpc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I believe my IP address was caught up in a block. I have not engaged in vandalism or disruptive editing. Could you please review my case? Thank you!

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using Wikipedia:Get my IP address. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide the IP address privately. Yamla (talk) 09:55, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

May 2025

Hi Nathanielpc! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Steely Dan several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Steely Dan, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:28, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. An edit that you recently made to Birmingham City F.C. seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jessicapierce (talk) 17:18, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, please don't make changes which are explicitly warned against in editorial notes - at least not without having a good reason, and explaining your changes. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 17:18, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]