User talk:Murad.Pashazadeh

This is Murad.Pashazadeh's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexandra Kremer-Khomassouridze (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cinder painter was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Primary sources prevail, while lefigaro and others potentially reliable sources are not fully focused on the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alexandra Kremer-Khomassouridze and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cinder painter (talk) 14:44, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Murad.Pashazadeh! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cinder painter (talk) 14:44, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for reviewing my submission and for your helpful comments.

I understand that the main concern is the predominance of primary sources and the lack of sufficiently reliable secondary sources to verify the information.

Could you please clarify or give some examples of the specific sources or statements that require stronger independent references?

For example, which particular claims or sections need more robust secondary sourcing?

I want to improve the draft accordingly to meet Wikipedia’s standards, so your advice will be very valuable.

Thank you again for your time and support. Murad.Pashazadeh (talk) 14:58, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You rejected the article without explaining the reasons or providing any recommendations for further action. Murad.Pashazadeh (talk) 16:52, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]