User talk:Morpheus63

Copyright problems with Transparency Monitor

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Transparency Monitor, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.tmonitor.co/learn/why-transparency. As a copyright violation, Transparency Monitor appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Transparency Monitor has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Transparency Monitor and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Transparency Monitor with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Transparency Monitor.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.

Welcome!

Hello, Morpheus63, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Transparency Monitor, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Crusio (talk) 16:59, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Transparency Monitor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Transparency Monitor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Crusio (talk) 16:59, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Transparency Monitor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Transparency Monitor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Crusio (talk) 17:26, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to note about speedy deletion

You said: "This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... I am the same author as some of the text on tmonitor.co. I have created this management principles (quite like BTM that was created by Faisal Hoque). I have added a framework that would be changed in verbiage."—I can't parse this entire sentence, but it does not matter if you are the owner of the copyrighted text; we can not just take your word for it. To donate it, you might consider changing this: http://www.tmonitor.co/terms-of-use to reflect that you wish to license the material under GFDL and CC-BY-SA. Another way is here.

But, ultimately, you should not be editing this page, since you have a conflict of interest. It is considered extremely poor form to promote your business on Wikipedia. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 17:48, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at BTM (Business Technology Management) that was pioneered by a private company. I am creating a term, not promoting my company. There is no reference of my company name there. But you have deleted based on copywrite which is incorrect. I think you should let the content evolve and then decide. Morpheus63 (talk) 17:52, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I have just entered a draft; the content will all be changed, but you did not even give me a few hours to change it. Morpheus63 (talk) 17:52, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get a response on what do I need to do get approval on this topic from you? I do need to create one. Thanks... Morpheus63 (talk) 21:25, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Transparency Monitor

The article Transparency Monitor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article, seems to be mostly OR.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 14:23, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]