User talk:Mlopezer
Mlopezer, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Mlopezer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:10, 12 March 2020 (UTC) |
Welcome Mlopezer!
I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| To help get you started, you may find these useful: | When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
Blocked
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Graham87 04:58, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Your first few edits were fine, but your other edits were most definitely not ... I don't think anybody would consider unblocking you without an explanation about what on earth you were trying to do and your aims here. Graham87 04:58, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Mlopezer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I hope that my intent is the same as all other wikipedia editors, and that is to add value and credibility to wikipedia. As a new user trying to add value, I have made grammatical improvements, cleaned up languaged, and added citations. I have done my best to learn the ropes initially by making smaller edits, averaging nearly 2 contributions a day. Particularly focusing on pages that wikipedia has cited as being limited in content or the "random article" that Wikipedia provides. If you look at my history as well, you can see how I have attempted to learn how to add more and more value to the wikipedia community. If you look at my contributions, my aim has been to make an active difference where it matters the most. Would love to have a better understanding of what the differences were between my earlier and later edits. I've been a user for less than a month, and would love to better understand how to comply with wikipedia's standards
Decline reason:
There's quite a bit of overlinking. This also has a misleading edit summary. This introduces an error of fact. This adds content copy-pasted from the (anyway unreliable) source, a copyright problem. The tone is also unsuitable for an encyclopedia. This makes the grammar worse. This is a blatantly inappropriate link bordering on link spam. That's quite a slate of problems for a very short history. Huon (talk) 02:40, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mlopezer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Insert your reason to be unblocked here I want to apologize and thank you and others for the tireless work to be an editor. At that time I didn't understand the exact rules, and commitment to be a great editor. However, I was excited to be one and so I tried to make positive contributions in a short amount of time, not quite understanding what goes into a correct edit. I have had time to read through the welcome guides and with my experience I believe I can be a fantastic contributor. In alignment with the wikipedia:Five Pillars I assure you that I acted in good faith and hope that you can assume good faith on my part as well. Please let me take this as a warning.
Decline reason:
This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
- Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
- Read our guide to improving articles.
- Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
- Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
- Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
- do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this:
{{infobox name|...}}); - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this:
[[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]); - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this:
[[Category:Name]]); - do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this:
{{Foo stub}});
- do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this:
- Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this:
== [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet; - Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "
Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution." - You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose:
{{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
- Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
- When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.
If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.