User talk:Mapangale

April 2025

Hello, I'm Knitsey. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Worksafe (Western Australia) have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Take a look at our guidelines about external links. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not hijack articles Knitsey (talk) 14:00, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Litein, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Knitsey (talk) 14:01, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing?

Why are you randomly adding spaces to articles? You are wasting other editors time because your edits have to be reviewed... please knock it off. Marcus Markup (talk) 14:03, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect they might be gaming the system. Knitsey (talk) 14:05, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No doubt. Ten edits, exactly. Now all they need to do is wait four days to be able to edit semi-protected pages... I'll be keeping an eye on this one. Marcus Markup (talk) 14:14, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: WorkStaff (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sophisticatedevening was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WorkStaff and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 19:03, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mapangale! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 19:03, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: WorkStaff (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zzz plant was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hello, did you mean to remove sources between the first and second submission? I see there used to be three references but now there is just one, from a non-independent source. To demonstrate this company's notability you need to include significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. I also encourage you to review our notability requirements before amending and resubmitting the draft. It would be helpful for future reviewers if you can identify the three best sources that establish notability of the subject on the draft's talk page. Thank you,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WorkStaff and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zzz plant (talk) 04:26, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]