User talk:MakeOverNow

Welcome!

Hi MakeOverNow! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 11:05, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks MakeOverNow (talk) 11:06, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maffian

Hi there, I saw that you reverted the edit I made to the Maffian article. The EP fails WP:NALBUM is not notable. I did the right thing by redirecting the article to the artist's page. I am going to nominate it for deletion and it will end up being redirected to its parent article. You reverted my edit without any explanation. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 17:49, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The EP did chart on US & UK Apple Music Album chart at #57 & #82 and peaked at number 2 on Nigeria Apple Music Album Top 100 and number 3 at TurnTable Top 100 Albums. [1][2] MakeOverNow (talk) 20:42, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nine+ Records for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nine+ Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nine+ Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 18:25, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:TheChineseGroundnut per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheChineseGroundnut. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Spicy (talk) 18:06, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MakeOverNow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why exactly is my account been blocked because I still don't understand. I don't know who is User:TheChineseGroundnut. I am not a sockpuppet to the user. I'm only writing articles I see fit and if you check my previous edits, you'll know that's the kind of pages I write. The album The Footprint is popping everywhere, that's why I wrote about it, I didn't know the page or the owner of the album is a sockpuppet. You can't just block my account for one mistake, and also delete 5ive (Davido album) which you know is notable because it's the upcoming of album of Nigerian-American singer Davido. Please don't block my account for one mistake or delete the album I've worked on for long time because of one mistake. What you could have have done is to delete the album The Footprint if that was the issue. Thank you.

Decline reason:

This is less of an appeal, and more of a rant. The only salient part pertaining to your block is "Why exactly is my account been blocked because I still don't understand", the answer to which is that you've been blocked for sockpuppetry based on technical evidence as well as behavioural. I'm declining your appeal, such as it is. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:45, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MakeOverNow (talk) 06:53, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MakeOverNow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I am writing to formally appeal the block placed on my account due to allegations of being a sockpuppet of User:TheChineseGroundnut which I'm not. I want to clarify that I am not associated with that user in any way. My contributions to wikipedia have always been made in good faith, with the intention of expanding well-sourced and verifiable information on topics of interest which is music.

The article I created about The Footprint album was written following wikipedia’s guidelines, just like my previous contributions, including Funds (song), ayo maff, and nine+ records. These demonstrate my consistent approach to contributing factual, sourced content to the platform. My motivation for creating The Footprint article was simply that I found it notable, similar to my other contributions.

I understand wikipedia's policies on sockpuppetry and the importance of maintaining integrity within the community. However, I believe this block was a misunderstanding, as I have not engaged in any form of abusive multiple account behavior. If there is any specific evidence that led to this decision, I would appreciate the opportunity to clarify any concerns.

I kindly request that my account be reviewed and unblocked so I can continue contributing to wikipedia in accordance with its guidelines. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Decline reason:

You're blocked, not ChatGPT. -- asilvering (talk) 01:56, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MakeOverNow (talk) 18:11, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing MakeOverNow (talk) 23:25, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Spicy please someone should review my appeal. Thank you MakeOverNow (talk) 21:20, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]