Jump to content

User talk:Macthing

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Macthing!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at firstโ€”it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธโ€๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆโ€๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ 23:59, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Takis (designer) (October 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Wikishovel (talk) 16:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Macthing! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wikishovel (talk) 16:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Takis (designer) (October 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bobby Cohn were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
A lot of unsourced and unattributed promotional phrasing here, e.g.: the entirety of #Design philosophy.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Bobby Cohn ๐Ÿ (talk) 15:26, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Please be very careful not to remove the previous Articles for Creation templates, including decline notices and comments from reviewers.

When you want to resubmit the draft, please just click the "Resubmit" button in the most recent pink decline box. It looks like you added some AI generated template in an attempt to submit the draft; as a result, the draft was impossible to review. I have restored the templates so it's possible for you to resubmit. --bonadea contributions talk 14:51, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much Bonadea. Apologies for not understanding, but does this mean i have to re-submit what i submitted yesterday? Macthing (talk) 16:23, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, please ignore my previous comment, i'd misunderstood. Thanks for bringing this to my attention, I'll resubmit in the coming days. Thanks again. Macthing (talk) 12:41, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Takis (designer) (December 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia articleโ€”that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Your references are, in the main, lists f shows confirming that Takis was involved. They are not about Takis which disqualifies most of them. We do not have an interest in the volume of his work. We need to know what is said about him in references which pass WP:42 The Ai element appears to have been removed successful. Poor referencing remains. Poor referencing prevents our seeing any potential notability
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธโ€๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆโ€๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ 23:59, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Timtrent, thanks for your review, all noted. No problem, please bear with me, i'll get onto the edits in the coming days. Macthing (talk) 15:37, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]