User talk:Lucaskim7/sandbox

Hey Lucas,

I believe that your contributions to the civic engagement article are great. You have identified many areas of bias that you intend to remove and replace with more neutral statements. Maybe potentially when you're citing evidence from articles, use less direct quotes and utilize more paraphrasing instead. However, you do a great job of maintaining neutrality and the reliability of your sources are very strong. Kyle.chan201 (talk) 22:04, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Peer Evaluation: Hey this is Komal! First and foremost I really like the way you set up your draft. It's very easy to read and understand. I really do like how you emphasized the different countries around the world and their use of civil engagement. I also really like how you brought up civil learning because that's so important! Just make sure your sources are reliable and properly placed. Other than that, your draft is amazing and well written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Komalbadesha (talk • contribs) 02:01, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Peer review

Hi @Lucaskim7! I thought your article draft was really well-written and easy to digest as a reader. Overall, it was clear, concise, and organized. The draft was really detailed and I liked how you incorporated the specific quotes from your sources in the draft as well. Your sources are reliable and stem from a diverse range of authors, but one thing I noticed was that the citing format was a little off. Also, I noticed that your Lead section is lacking since you jump straight into the details of your draft so perhaps focus a little on providing a brief introduction of what you're planning on discussing in the Lead paragraph in the beginning, but overall good starting point! --Lindseyjli3 (talk) 05:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)