User talk:Lt.gen.zephyr

Helicopter shot — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:408D:3C1A:E9A0:0:0:90C8:700D (talk) 09:52, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi CaptShayan! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Thewikizoomer (talk) 05:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rahimuddin Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iqbal Khan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohammad Saiful Alam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SUP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Asim Jawad

The article Asim Jawad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sad event, but a WP:BIO1E without lasting notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:54, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Asim Jawad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asim Jawad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asim Jawad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 11:05, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kabir Ahmed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Military Secretary.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Logged out editing

Hello

I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits or comments while logged out as seen in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aaaas216%26&diff=prev&oldid=1279309014] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Waker-Uz-Zaman&diff=prev&oldid=1278519110]. Note that WP:SOCK is a seriously violation and using to violate WP:NPA may result to be block from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Aaaas216& (talk) 20:21, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

was not me buddy. I wasnt using wikipedia for the last few days as I was travelling. CaptShayan (talk) 10:31, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I commented about the post nominal afterwards, no idea who commented before. But I do agree with that guy's statement to some extent. CaptShayan (talk) 10:33, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raj Mohan Vohra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Edward's School.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Fazika

Hello CaptShayan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Battle of Fazika for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 21:09, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing it John. Have a great day! CaptShayan (talk) 20:07, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vijayant Thapar (officer)

Hello, CaptShayan,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Pppery and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Vijayant Thapar (officer), for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pppery}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:43, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Vijayant Thapar (officer)

Hello CaptShayan, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Vijayant Thapar (officer), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijayant Thapar (officer).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pppery}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:32, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pppery: sorry, didn't see your message in my talk. Sent you a message in your talk, hoping to resolve this issue. Although I have mentioned it in previous spaces, it is to be noted thatthe article does not fail WP:NOTE. CaptShayan (talk) 18:31, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Indo-Pakistani war of 1947–1948, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:06, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Cinderella157 (talk) 00:54, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

None of my edits contradicts these five points. I'm just curious why an editor suddenly reverted 5000 bytes without doing a consensus whereas you can see the talk page of the article that while adding these, it was discussed on the tp. ᶜᵒᶥᵒⁿᵉᶥ (talk) 06:14, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hussain Saddam (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Reading Beans were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I’m afraid but concerned raised five years ago are still the main issue of my decline. Best,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hussain Saddam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 05:42, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lt.gen.zephyr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 05:42, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Jassar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Jassar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Jassar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mithilanchalputra (Talk) 07:31, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Jassar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Battle of Jassar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.hilal.gov.pk/view-article.php?i=6552 and https://tribune.com.pk/story/2434281/1965-war-their-finest-hour. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SunloungerFrog (talk) 08:29, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify it. Will work on it later and submit via AfC. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 13:16, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Battle of Jassar

Hello Lt.gen.zephyr! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Battle of Jassar, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://web.archive.org/web/20250325211044/https://www.hilal.gov.pk/view-article.php?i=6552 https://tribune.com.pk/story/2434281/1965-war-their-finest-hour, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Battle of Jassar and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Battle of Jassar, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Battle of Jassar. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Battle of Jassar with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Battle of Jassar saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:33, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've also removed non-free content copied by you from an external source from Draft:Inderbal Singh Bawa (see below). Please read and take notice of our copyright policy, and be aware that editors who repeatedly violate that policy risk permanent loss of editing privileges. If there's any other page where you've copied non-free external content, please mention it here so that it too can be cleaned up. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:27, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Inderbal Singh Bawa moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Inderbal Singh Bawa. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and there's hardly anything left after removal of the copyvio. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:51, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]