User talk:Lokeshgavara
May 2026
[edit]
Please refrain from hijacking pages, as you did with one of the pages you edited. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Please also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Izno (talk) 06:28, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Hello Lokeshgavara. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lokeshgavara. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lokeshgavara|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 09:58, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Do you have a connection to the user CUTMAP (talk · contribs)? --bonadea contributions talk 09:59, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
- yes i am currently working Gramtarang Technologies and Dr.Dn rao said to update the content Lokeshgavara (talk) 10:47, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Lokeshgavara, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lokeshgavara|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 12:33, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. bonadea contributions talk 05:04, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Centurion University, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 10:44, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Centurion University, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:00, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Prof Mukti Kanta Mishra, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 11:02, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Centurion University of Technology and Management, Andhra Pradesh. Adakiko (talk) 11:05, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Prasanta Kumar Mohanty (May 26)
[edit]
Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.
Next steps
- If you have discovered significant new sources or believe this rejection was an error, you may ask the reviewer to reconsider on their talk page.
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Prof Mukti Kanta Mishra (May 26)
[edit]Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.
Next steps
- If you have discovered significant new sources or believe this rejection was an error, you may ask the reviewer to reconsider on their talk page.
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Dechiraju Narasimha Rao (May 26)
[edit]Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.
Next steps
- If you have discovered significant new sources or believe this rejection was an error, you may ask the reviewer to reconsider on their talk page.
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
May 2026
[edit]
Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For an unblock to be considered, you must:
- Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
- State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
- Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
Administrators: if this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue. Admins lifting or loosening such blocks without appropriate authorization may, at the discretion of the Arbitration Committee, be desysopped.
- Besides being almost certainly an undisclosed paid editor, which you have failed to comment on despite multiple queries, I also believe you are either a sock or meat puppet of the blocked user CUTMAP (which, again, was queried but to which you did not respond). Accordingly, I have blocked you from editing at least until such time as you can give satisfactory explanations to these matters, and undertake to comply with our paid editing rules which you have so far been flagrantly flouting. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:44, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Supriya Pattanayak (May 27)
[edit]
You must place an inline citation directly after:
- quotations;
- any material whose verifiability is likely to be challenged or is contentious;
- any material about living people.
Please edit your draft to support your statements with inline citations. Learn how to create inline citations in the:
- Source Editor: Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup.
- VisualEditor: Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Supriya Pattanayak to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
|
Hello, Lokeshgavara!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:40, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
|