User talk:Liftarn

; Archives
	/Archive 1; /Archive 2; /Archive 3; /Archive 4; /Archive 5; /Archive 6; /Archive 7;

This discussion page may contain trolling. Before you post any reply, consider how you might minimize the effects of trollish comments. Simply ignoring certain comments may be the best option. If you must respond, a temperate response is always best, whether trolling is suspected or not.

Template for deletion

Nomination for merging of Template:Criticism of Islam sidebar

Template:Criticism of Islam sidebar has been nominated for merging with Template:Criticism of religion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.

Proposed deletion of OS-X

The article OS-X has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability problem; looks like someone's hobby project.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for d

Taio Cruz Name

See Talk:Taio Cruz#Your Game credits

See Talk:Taio Cruz#Alias

Just 'n' alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Happy First Edit Anniversary Liftarn 🎉

Hey @Liftarn. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 23 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 19:36, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Moskvitch G3 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moskvitch G3 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moskvitch G3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

4meter4 (talk) 21:50, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Moskvitch G4 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moskvitch G4 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moskvitch G4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

4meter4 (talk) 15:23, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tjena - just wanted to let you know that I added a bunch of references to this; I take pride in protecting articles from needless deletion and have emerged successful several times. Please add your voice at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moskvitch G4. Mr.choppers | ✎ 05:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hej, såg din kommentar men det skulle hjälpa mer om du skriver keep längst ner. Tror även att G3 kommer att bli återskapad utan problem. Mvh, Mr.choppers | ✎ 15:34, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]