User talk:Learn From It

Classical liberalism

In regards to the Classical liberalism article, the consensus is against you, and you've been reverted by several other editors/ As per Wikipedia's "Bold, Revert, Discuss" policy, the next step is for you to begin a discussion on the talk page and try and help other editors understand your changes, and get the consensus to agree with your changes. Good luck! Dayewalker (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Either discuss or butt out. Learn From It (talk) 02:09, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely response. I would suggest you read about Wikipedia's Three Revert Rule. What you are doing now on the page is edit warring, which can result in a block. I advise you again to please take discussion of your edits to the talk page. Dayewalker (talk) 02:11, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You came riding in your high horse to an article and reverted without ever having discussed the reason for your revert other than that other people reverted it. You're full it, dude. If you're going to revert, you need to have a more substantial reason for it than that. Learn From It (talk) 02:13, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware of WP:3RR; and indeed WP:NPA William M. Connolley (talk) 08:56, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. That discussion can be found here [1]. Thank you. Dayewalker (talk) 00:44, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gee thanks. Learn From It (talk) 22:26, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]