User talk:Keyport6

April 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pancreas, you may be blocked from editing. —Stephen (talk) 14:21, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ax Men, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ax Men was changed by Keyport6 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880099 on 2011-05-13T12:39:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:39, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kim Kardashian. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kim Kardashian was changed by Keyport6 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.940126 on 2011-05-13T19:00:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:00, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kim Kardashian with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. FrostedΔ14 19:01, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Denny's, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you! -- Island Monkey ^{talk the talk} 18:27, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hal Buckley

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hal Buckley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. PTJoshua (talk) 21:11, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Selma to Montgomery marches. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JoshMcCracken (talk) 03:36, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Christopher Columbus, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Christopher Columbus was changed by Keyport6 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858355 on 2012-01-19T15:50:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:50, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Christopher Columbus. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. WikiPuppies! (bark) 15:55, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Christopher Columbus, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Christopher Columbus was changed by Keyport6 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885396 on 2012-01-23T15:28:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:28, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Christopher Columbus with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 15:30, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Christopher Columbus with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 15:36, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 15:44, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to the page Bridge appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. - Denimadept (talk) 16:31, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 00:27, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of box office bombs. - ^theWOLFchild 20:02, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SQL ^{Query me!} 20:39, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]