User talk:KRYPTOS

Welcome

Hello, KRYPTOS, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

KRYPTOS, good luck, and have fun. Laser brain (talk) 17:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bold, Revert, Discuss (BRD) for Taylor Lorenz

Hi KRYPTOS. You have recently tried to re-add content to Taylor Lorenz. There is some discussion on Talk:Taylor Lorenz regarding this content, and some users have suggested it should not be included. Since there is current discussion, I suggest making your case for inclusion there, rather than simply re-adding the content (which is considered a poor editing strategy in most cases). Consider checking out the explanatory document Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle for an understanding of one style of consensus-building on Wikipedia.

One suggestion I have if you want to make a stronger case for inclusion is this: you should try to find additional strong sources that support claims you want to make. See Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources if you need help figuring out what sources are more likely to be accepted.

Best of luck! Jlevi (talk) 16:07, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I agree that my initial linking of Greenwald's Substack was not sufficient, but you yourself agreed that the addition of the links provided in the edit were "much better", implying that the matter was settled. I really have to wonder why you're pushing goalposts here. KRYPTOS (talk) 16:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]