User talk:Jwlryedit

October 2025

Hello, I'm Janan2025. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Aden Abdullahi Nur have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Janan2025 (talk) 21:32, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jwlryedit. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jwlryedit. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jwlryedit|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 18:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of LEVUMA

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on LEVUMA, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 18:48, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Levuma moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Levuma. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you have an unaddressed conflict of interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 22:48, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - i have just added a disclosure on my profile regarding my role. The article is fully sourced with independent coverage from major publications (Vogue Arabia, Hia, People, CNN, Gheir, InStyle etc.) and written in neutral tone. Kindly requesting re-review for publication. Jwlryedit (talk) 04:31, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - Disclosure added on user page in line with COI policy. Article fully sourced with independent coverage from reputable international publications, including Vogue Arabia (Condé Nast, two separate feature articles), People, CNN Greece, InStyle USA, Grazia, Arab News - leading newspaper in the Middle East, Hia Magazine—one of the leading fashion titles in the Middle East—and Gheir Magazine. All content has been written in a neutral, encyclopedic tone with verified citations. Jwlryedit (talk) 04:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have moved your article back to draftspace. As a COI editor, you should not directly edit in the mainspace, e.g. move the page there yourself. What you can do instead is submit your page through WP:Articles for creation. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 12:23, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Levuma (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheObsidianGriffon was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Levuma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheObsidianGriffon (talk) 00:23, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jwlryedit! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheObsidianGriffon (talk) 00:23, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Levuma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Levuma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Levuma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 21:07, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]