User talk:Justinfr/archive1
14 June 2008 to 31 July 2008 |
Social psychology (psychology)
[edit]Sorry about that -- I was just trying to fix the capitalization in the link, and did not realize that you had changed it (similar words). Bankbryan (talk) 15:46, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- No worries, I figured it was likely an accident... less likely that you were some proselytizing physiologist! Cheers. Justinfr (talk) 23:31, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Golden West Radio
[edit]golden west radio has aquire CFEQ fm in winnipeg i want make the change
hi there —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterparker3000 (talk • contribs) 14:07, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]Hi Justinfr, I have granted your account rollback in accordance with your request for the tool. Please remember that rollback should only be used to revert vandalism, and should not be used to revert good-faith edits or to revert-war: misuse of the tool can lead to its removal. For more information, you may wish to see Wikipedia:Rollback feature and Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 21:16, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks a bunch. Bots keep beating me to it. Guess that means the system's working ;) Justinfr (talk) 21:18, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome! You'll find rollback to be much quicker at reverting vandalism than regular revert. :) Take care. Acalamari 21:19, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
bias
[edit]there is allot of pakistani hatred by skymith he refers to pakistans kashmir as occupied and indian kashmir as just kashmir why is there double standards can you refer me to non racist islamophobic editors preferably non europeans maybe africans please
- Show where. All those articles should say "-administered" — I know because I rewrote them. El_C 12:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not in a position to judge what's biased and what isn't. My point is that changes should reflect consensus and be the result of discussion. You should talk about them before making edits unilaterally, especially on controversial articles. Justinfr (talk) 12:21, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- Before I rewrote the leads to the Kashmir sets of articles, all the Pakistani ips would revert to Indian-occupied—Pakistan-controlled and the Indian editors would revert to Pakistani-occupied—Indian-controlled. Back and forth it went, over and over. So I just changed everything to -administered and that was that. Occasionally, we get pov-pushing edits that try to mess with that balance and give an "edge" to one of the two sides. I'm pretty determined to use any and every means at my disposal to prevent such a deterioration. Thx. El_C 12:28, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, if it wasn't clear, my message was to the anonymous guy, not you :) Justinfr (talk) 12:30, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- I know, but now you are reverting their edits automatically. Please don't do that. El_C 12:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, will stop. Just made a note on the talk page. Justinfr (talk) 12:42, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, regrettably, I had to block the ip, since reverts and other odd edits continued, and no talk page usage (not even a single one, despite my prior pleas). El_C 13:10, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, will stop. Just made a note on the talk page. Justinfr (talk) 12:42, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- I know, but now you are reverting their edits automatically. Please don't do that. El_C 12:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, if it wasn't clear, my message was to the anonymous guy, not you :) Justinfr (talk) 12:30, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- Before I rewrote the leads to the Kashmir sets of articles, all the Pakistani ips would revert to Indian-occupied—Pakistan-controlled and the Indian editors would revert to Pakistani-occupied—Indian-controlled. Back and forth it went, over and over. So I just changed everything to -administered and that was that. Occasionally, we get pov-pushing edits that try to mess with that balance and give an "edge" to one of the two sides. I'm pretty determined to use any and every means at my disposal to prevent such a deterioration. Thx. El_C 12:28, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
You're welcome
[edit]Glad to help. Cheers, 99.168.85.86 (talk) 00:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Jesse Helms
[edit]The edits were constructive and I resent being accused of vandalism. Are you going to tell me with a straight face that you can ignore Senator Stagalianos partnership with Helms?76.172.205.226 (talk) 21:25, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- I enjoy Zach Galifianakis as much as the next person, though I don't think Nick Galifianakis would appreciate it :) justinfr (talk) 21:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Your behAVIOR
[edit]SOP IT NOW —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.134.57.219 (talk) 13:03, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
- Perhaps you could be more specific about what it is you'd like me to sop. justinfr (talk) 13:05, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
- LOL! This one made me smile. Hazir (talk) 12:36, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
vandilism
[edit]i dont understand why you kept stopping change the truro city fc page i was trying to update it but couldnt because you kept stopping me why is this —Preceding unsigned comment added by Argyleandtrurolad (talk • contribs) 02:27, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- I left a message explaining on your IP's talk page. If you're making edits to an article, please be sure to leave an edit summary and citations otherwise people won't know whether you're making constructive edits or just vandalizing. justinfr (talk) 02:33, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Change in anti-german sentiment
[edit]Well, I have given an explanation in the discussion page (last section). The deleted part is non-sense, that mixes up the phenomena of Polish politicians trying to blame the Germans for everything if they have no other explanations, and the feelings of the people. But whatever, I don't care. I only know that I know better. Cheers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.52.159.246 (talk) 13:57, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation. The article is not my area of expertise, so I'm not in a position to debate content. It's just that whenever large blocks of content are removed without explanation, other editors tend to assume it's vandalism. If it's explained on the article's talk page, then people who are interested in the topic can talk about it an come to a consensus. Cheers... justinfr (talk) 14:01, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Uh...
[edit]You just reverted my reversion to Billy Mays, and templated me. Probably due to mistake, but I thought I should make you aware of it. LeiaY 15:45, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yup, sorry, I clicked revert while it still had the vandalized version but huggle didn't do it until yours was there for some reason. Thanks for the note... justinfr (talk) 15:48, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Mindless editing
[edit]Please actually read edits before issuing knee-jerk warnings about them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.76.156.255 (talk) 16:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- I already apologized and reverted my edits, but sorry again. justinfr (talk) 16:15, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Ohr Pnimi
[edit]Ohr Pnimi is led by Rav Fievel Okowita - student of Rav Baruch Shalom Ashlag and Yehuda Ashlag, so PLEASE before you remove something, make sure you know what you're doing. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.171.127.86 (talk) 21:20, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- When your link says "lessons in English" then it's obviously spam. Changing the label but repeatedly inserting the same link doesn't make it any less so. justinfr (talk) 21:22, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Because these ARE original materials based on their key works!! What should I call it to make your majesty like them???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.171.127.86 (talk) 21:24, 27 July 2008 (UTC)