User talk:Josh Parris/MOSDAB
Translation troubles
[change source]I had trouble translating these words and terms:
- wikt:actually
- wikt:album
- wikt:already
- ambiguous term
- wikt:article
- wikt:assume
- wikt:bolding
- wikt:can't
- wikt:capital letter
- wikt:capitalization
- wikt:categories
- category
- wikt:clarifier
- click that link
- wikt:concealing
- wikt:description
- dictionary definition
- wikt:displayed
- wikt:entry
- existing article
- wikt:expansion
- wikt:film (movie)
- wikt:fine
- wikt:formatting
- wikt:goal
- wikt:hatnote
- wikt:instead
- wikt:italics
- wikt:likely
- wikt:lowercase
- wikt:main
- wikt:maybe
- meaningful information
- more precise
- navigable link
- wikt:normally
- wikt:optional
- orphaned redlink
- wikt:parameter
- parameters
- parenthetical expression
- piped link
- wikt:presented
- wikt:punctuation
- wikt:quote
- wikt:rather
- wikt:raw
- wikt:replace
- wikt:synonymous
- wikt:target
- wikt:task
- wikt:television
- wikt:template
- wikt:title
- wikt:uppercase
- wikt:variants
- wikt:variation
- well-defined
- wiki markup
Some of them are unavoidable jargon (precise ways of talking about a specialized concept). Suggestions sought. Josh Parris 01:21, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Examples
[change source]Many of the examples used on :en don't work here. Should we port them over, or hunt for native examples? Josh Parris 01:21, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambig -> Did you mean
[change source]Disambiguate is not a simple english word. Did you mean, however, means much the same thing. I propose renaming disambiguating to something simple. Perhaps indexing? Or is that categorizing? Or is categorizing grouping? Josh Parris 01:30, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Primary Topic
[change source]I've renamed Primary Topic to Common Meaning, in keeping with simple english. Josh Parris 01:37, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Order of entries
[change source]I haven't given Order of entries much attention because it is tightly bound to its example. Josh Parris 03:07, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Introductory line
[change source]John Smith may mean:
or
John Smith is the name of:
I'd like to drop the "is the name of" option. Little is lost, and with less choice comes less arguments and simpler (shorter) guidelines. Josh Parris 03:45, 6 March 2012 (UTC)