User talk:Jess5983

Jess5983, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jess5983! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charged Up, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freestyle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to Nunca Voy a Olvidarte. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. If you are going to change the date format for an album or a single's release date, then at least change the date formats throughout the article including the references for the sake of consistency. Erick (talk) 06:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Juan Gabriel. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Don't just the change the date format on the infobox and then leave date formats on the rest of the article the same. It's consistent and disruptive. Furthermore, you have not justified the reasons for the date change format. Erick (talk) 16:51, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at One Minute Man, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Rob van vee 05:47, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dallas police shooting

In this edit you changed it to "six officers killed" but the references which follow the shooting specify a smaller number killed. Please do not insert facts without providing a reliable source. Edison (talk) 15:19, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to 2016 shooting of Dallas police officers, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. None of the sources say anything about racism. - Mr X 15:07, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Number of Officers Killed

Hello, Jess5983. You recently made an edit saying 12 people were injured. As far as I an tell, most sources say five officers were killed and seven other officers were injured. Two civilians were also injured, totaling nine injured. Would you mind providing a source that says 12 people were injured and posting it on the talk page of the article, 2016 shooting of Dallas police officers? -- Gestrid (talk) 15:34, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:26, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Me Estoy Enamorando (album).

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop changing the date formats on infoboxes without changing the date formats on the rest of the article as it messes up the consistency. Furthermore, date formats should not be changed without a valid reason. Erick (talk) 21:55, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Trippin' (Total song). SummerPhD^v2.0 19:37, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jess6781, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Erick (talk) 15:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jess5983. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]