User talk:JackRubenacker/sandbox

Hello! Please do not swear on my talk page.

Ravin's Peer Review regarding Democracy 2.1

I enjoyed reading your article about Democracy 2.1 and really liked the variation you were able to place in the article. Furthermore I think you had a neutral point of view throughout the article. I also think your sources were spot on. Entropyfive (talk) 02:43, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Ravin! JackRubenacker (talk) 06:17, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Danny's Peer Review for one Mister Jack

Hey Jack you asked for some suggestions on how to improve your article. Start by adding an infobox. Add some photos, videos, something to make it less bland. It feels very factual and neutral at this point, but you could be even more unbiased. Think about adding in success stories of D21 improving vote results as well as failure stories. Also look into the possibility of hacking, trying to make this simple to a local voting audience, the relevance of this fairly new electoral system, and so on. Overall, it feels like you could do more with the article. Also add in other electoral systems that have also radically changed democracy with what worked and what didn't. Also the copyright for the creation of negative votes and such. Sorry if these comments are taken the wrong way, but that's what you asked for. Dannyticknor (talk) 00:28, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Danny! JackRubenacker (talk) 06:32, 9 April 2018 (UTC)