User talk:JCSigma2000

Welcome!

Hello, JCSigma2000!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 20:57, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLinks

Hi, I noticed that you recently added some wikilinks to the page Air India Flight 171. I just wanted to let you know that this was probably unnecessary. I do agree with you that some people may not know what a dreamliner or a ram air turbine is, and it would be useful to link those articles. However, if you look, you'll find that in both cases there was a previous mention of that term in a previous paragraph which was already linked. Things should usually only be linked once. Per MOS:LINKONCE, a term should not be linked more than once per major section, and some people are even of the opinion that terms should only be linked once in the entire article. Hope this helps! SI09 (talk) 23:14, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alr thx JCSigma2000 (talk) 16:19, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Piccadilly line, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 20:52, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks JCSigma2000 (talk) 22:01, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Air India Flight 171

I have noticed that many of your edits are being reverted, or otherwise contested, by multiple editors (including myself). I absolutely believe your changes are being made in good faith, but with apologies they are beginning to be disruptive. I might suggest limiting your edits to adding new information to the article as it becomes available, as your most problematic edits are small tweaks intended to improve something, but which unfortunately often do the opposite. Xan747 (talk) 16:13, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alr thx JCSigma2000 (talk) 17:24, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember Xan747’s advice above before making further edits to Air India Flight 171. Celjski Grad (talk) 12:36, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your most recent edit per consensus at Talk:Air_India_Flight_171#Lede_section that the lede section is not to be changed except for correcting errors, or to add newly available information. Your edit met neither of those criteria. Additionally, per the topic of this thread, your edit did not improve the article: the sentence was perfectly clear as written, and actually less awkward than your revision. Xan747 (talk) 17:58, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment in this edit continues to miss the point that the lede section is frozen by consensus at Talk:Air_India_Flight_171#Lede_section. You are welcome to propose changes to the lede on the article talk page. What you are doing instead is disruptive. Please stop. Xan747 (talk) 04:11, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SL7 bus route

You will need a reliable source to add the ev infomation on the SL7 page. i can only find a buses article that says it will use BYD BD11. Also i was the IP that reverted your edits, i was accidently logged out. DAmik001 (talk) 18:59, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I dont want to get to an edit war so i will put it there DAmik001 (talk) 19:00, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have now added the BYD BD11 on to the SL7's page. Can we agree now? DAmik001 (talk) 19:08, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright thank you but just saying bus fandom is 100% by far more reliable than Wikipedia around this topic. It contains way more information than Wikipedia at this point. JCSigma2000 (talk) 22:28, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is like 3 fandoms saying it has PVR of 21. JCSigma2000 (talk) 22:31, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are multiple edits saying that wiki is unreliable such as [1] and [2] and there is also [3] and [4]. This is because it is Self-published/User-Generated. Even if they look more reliable than wikipedia, they're still unreliable. DAmik001 (talk) 17:29, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

alright than. thx JCSigma2000 (talk) 18:15, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]