User talk:J'ai pas vingt ans !

Your GA nomination of Fifty-Sixty

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fifty-Sixty you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 03:23, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fifty-Sixty

The article Fifty-Sixty you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Fifty-Sixty for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 05:21, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

7e ciel moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 7e ciel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 02:38, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you read the message in view history... but I clearly stated that I was still working on it. I just wanted to publish it to so I can upload the album image that belongs with it. I have sources and I was planning to use them. Can you please move it back to a normal, viewable article? J'ai pas vingt ans ! (talk) 02:40, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HI. We understand, but please bear in mind that all articles must be adequately sourced. Also, reviewers have an extremely heavy workload and may often base their review on the information provided by the reviewing tools. Articles that are not ready for mainspace can be moved to draft by a reviewer after one hour. That should provide normally creators with adequate time to create acceptable articles with the basic requirements. You could consider preparing your articles offline or in your Wikipedia sandbox before posting them in mainspace. Don't hesitate to ask for advice at The Teahouse. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:56, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:7e ciel has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:7e ciel. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 02:39, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Toi mon amour (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoldRomean was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Toi mon amour instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Toi mon amour and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoldRomean (talk) 20:40, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, J'ai pas vingt ans !! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoldRomean (talk) 20:40, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]