User talk:Iradiumhighh

Speedy deletion nomination of RICHIEMORALES

Hello Iradiumhighh,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged RICHIEMORALES for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. AssortedLiquorice (talk) 07:56, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Paola Andino has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Paola Andino was changed by Iradiumhighh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963154 on 2015-11-30T08:14:53+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Paola Andino

Hello. I noticed that you recently made a contribution to the Paola Andino article that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! However, test edits on live articles disrupt Wikipedia and may confuse readers. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:24, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Daniela Nieves. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 09:49, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Every Witch Way episodes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 10:53, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Every Witch Way. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 11:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Carry Out, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Carry Out was changed by Iradiumhighh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.940416 on 2015-11-30T15:14:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Carry Out. DVdm (talk) 15:21, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of RICHIEMORALES

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on RICHIEMORALES requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WayfaringWanderer (talk) 21:32, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

saved

U Iradiumhighh (talk) 21:33, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool

Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 00:11, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]