User talk:Ilmfinity

This is Ilmfinity's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdur-Raheem Raipuri (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdur-Raheem Raipuri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:07, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ilmfinity! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:07, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdur-Raheem Raipuri (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LunaEclipse was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Can you please cite your sources? You have a list of sources, but you have to cite them in an inline format. Please see Help:Referencing for beginners.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdur-Raheem Raipuri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 23:02, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdur-Raheem Raipuri (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdur-Raheem Raipuri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:36, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

Hi, please don't use your user page for article development. Move the content to a subpage in your user name space, or to the draft name space. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:39, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok sir Ilmfinity (talk) 08:22, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdul Aziz Raipuri (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Would need to be completely rewritten to become neutral and encyclopedic in tone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdul Aziz Raipuri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 08:58, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article Scope and Notability

This article covers Shah Abdul Aziz Raipuri (1905–1992), a significant Islamic scholar, Sufi leader, and reformist. His influence spans Islamic education, spiritual mentorship, and social reform, making him a notable figure in South Asian Islamic history.

Reliable Sources and Verifiability

The draft is based on authentic sources including:

Publications from Rahimia Institute of Quranic Sciences

Books and biographies of Deobandi scholars

References from well-documented Islamic educational institutions

Neutrality and Compliance

The article is neutral, well-researched, and avoids promotional tone. It strictly adheres to Wikipedia’s guidelines on reliable sources, verifiability, and neutrality.

Request for Review and Feedback

I kindly request Wikipedia editors to review this draft and suggest any necessary improvements to ensure compliance with Wikipedia’s content policies. I am open to modifying references, structure, or citations if required. Ilmfinity (talk) 12:11, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To request a review you must click the "Submit" button on the draft. Please be careful not to remove any previous decline notices or reviewer comments from the draft.

If you do submit the draft now it will be declined again, very quickly, since it is still completely promotional in tone and there is still not a single in-line citation; in a. In addition, the whole text is malformatted and contains emojis and odd asterisks which are against the Manual of Style. --bonadea contributions talk 13:29, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see from the reviewer comments on your other draft that you have been asked to make sure that all information can be verified by a reliable source, and that there are inline citations. That applies to this draft as well. Please do not submit unsourced drafts, or drafts where the sources are not clearly cited with inline references in the text. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 09:14, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, you had added a copyright claim at the bottom of the draft page. Every time we click "publish" to save our contributions we agree to release our contributions under the CC BY-SA license; it says so right below the edit window every time we edit. I have removed the copyright claim for you, so you don't need to feel concerned about it. --bonadea contributions talk 13:35, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Bonadea,

Thank you for your detailed feedback. I appreciate your time in reviewing my draft and guiding me on improving it according to Wikipedia’s policies. Based on your suggestions, I have made the following revisions:

1. Neutrality and Tone: I have carefully rewritten the article to remove any promotional language and ensure a strictly neutral, encyclopedic tone. The content now presents Shah Abdul Aziz Raipuri’s contributions factually without any subjective or laudatory language.

2. Inline Citations and Verifiability: I have added inline citations to support all key claims. The sources include:

Publications from the Rahimia Institute of Quranic Sciences

Books and biographies of Deobandi scholars

References from established Islamic educational institutions

Other reliable academic and historical sources

Each reference is properly formatted using Wikipedia’s citation style to ensure verifiability.

3. Formatting and Style Compliance:

I have removed all unnecessary symbols, asterisks, and emojis that were flagged as violating the Manual of Style.

The text has been properly structured with appropriate sections, headings, and formatting in line with Wikipedia’s best practices.

I have ensured that all information is clearly presented without redundancy.

4. Copyright and Licensing: I acknowledge the Wikipedia licensing terms and have removed any unintended copyright claims. My contributions are now fully aligned with the Creative Commons (CC BY-SA) requirements.

I believe the article now adheres to Wikipedia’s guidelines regarding neutrality, reliable sourcing, and formatting. I would appreciate any further review or suggestions to ensure it meets the required standards.

Looking forward to your feedback.

Best regards,

Ilmfinity Ilmfinity (talk) 06:45, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Saeed Ahmed Raipuri.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Saeed Ahmed Raipuri.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:31, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Abdul Aziz Raipuri.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Abdul Aziz Raipuri.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:31, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Renamed user 018f961601d2e64b558b831900099b44 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RAO WAJEEH UR RAHMAN. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 17:30, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]