User talk:Icpsr-websupport
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Online Learning Center, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/OLC. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:33, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Copyright problems with Online Learning Center
[edit]
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Online Learning Center, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/OLC/. As a copyright violation, Online Learning Center appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Online Learning Center has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Online Learning Center and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Online Learning Center with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Online Learning Center.
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. DGG (talk) 17:55, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
advice
[edit]Please see our Business FAQ (which also applies to non-profit organisations). Even were you to give us permission , the sort of text on your web site is promotional, not the informative encyclopedic material appropriate here. Please try to describe it in a way that makes it clear what university you are talking about, provide 3rd party independent reliable published sources, print or online (but not blogs or press releases) to show its importance, and do include some information about context. I think this might possibly make a suitable Wikipedia article. As an administrator here, I often work with articles dealing with higher education, os please ask m for any necessary assistance. (one further thing--please adopt an different username, not one that indicates an organization--only individual people may edit Wikipedia. But do say on the user page what organization you are affiliated with. ) DGG (talk) 17:55, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Welfare, Children, and Families: A Three-City Study
[edit]Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. CardinalDan (talk) 15:08, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Nomination of Welfare, Children, and Families: A Three-City Study for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Welfare, Children, and Families: A Three-City Study is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Welfare, Children, and Families: A Three-City Study until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Student7 (talk) 23:09, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Welfare, Children, and Families: A Three-City Study requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SudoGhost™ 22:29, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of National Head Start/Public School Early Childhood Transition Demonstration Study, 1991-1999
[edit]
The article National Head Start/Public School Early Childhood Transition Demonstration Study, 1991-1999 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Original research. Little independent coverage to suggest that the study has had an impact on its field.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrStrauss talk 09:26, 13 September 2017 (UTC)