Jump to content

User talk:Rich Farmbrough

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Helpful Pixie Bot)
Note
Email may very occasionally be delayed due to spam filtering.


Links
Talk Archive Index

Table oddities

[edit]
I II III IV V VI VII VIII
4913
7903
8991
4913
7903
8991

4913
7903
8991

4913

7903
8991

4913

7903 8991

4913 7903 8991

4913

7903

8991

4913

7903

8991

Cheshunt Lock and other notes

[edit]

2025

[edit]

Things to unarchive

[edit]

Space discussion.

Yo Ho Ho!

[edit]

Cite journal on MG WP

[edit]

Trying to get this to work with Content Translation.[18] I imagine it does not work as it is such an old version. How best does one update this? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:17, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Are you trying to translate the documentation or the template itself? All the best: Rich Farmbrough 16:36, 28 February 2026 (UTC).[reply]
Trying to use a version of Content Translation to translate into MG and want the citation templates to come through. I have added template metadata. But still not working perfectly. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:01, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Not automated, but here's how I recommend migrating specific templates. This is a potentially very resilient method. (I have a lot more ideas, but they are not as easily compatible with Lua as with the pure template system.) All the best: Rich Farmbrough 19:59, 28 February 2026 (UTC).[reply]
If the mg wiki doesn't have the Extension:Cite that may be an issue. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 20:09, 28 February 2026 (UTC).[reply]
You added the Cite Journal template on MG WP in 2011.[19] The question is does it just need updating? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:02, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like it is working now Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:25, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Cladotherianthrope has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 28 § Cladotherianthrope until a consensus is reached. Abesca (talk) 15:41, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Time spent handling this request, 1 hour 25 minutes. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 17:41, 28 February 2026 (UTC).[reply]

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 February 28 § Category:Session musicians on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SMasonGarrison 19:28, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedians for Sustainable Development - February 2026 Newsletter

[edit]
This is our fifty second newsletter. This issue has news related to SDG 4, 5, 10, 13, 15, 16 and 17.
User group news
  • A proposal for a climate and sustainability meetup at Wikimania has been submitted. Keep your fingers crossed it gets accepted!
Other news
Events

This message was sent with Global message delivery by Ainali (talk) 12:13, 2 March 2026 (UTC)ContributeManage subscription[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #721

[edit]

Tech News: 2026-10

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 17:50, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

On February 2nd, you added a hidden comment - 15 <-- please do not reduce this without discussion --> - and also changed the number of posts retained to before auto-archiving. Now the talk page has posts & threads from all through January etc. with no new comments. Since the posting furor has gone down a bit, I would like to change the auto-archiving from 7 days to 14 & the number of 'threads kept' to 5 (instead of 15), but wanted to have your thoughts on the matter first. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 01:43, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

HI, thanks for messaging me. I'm completely happy for you to make the timescale 14 days, but I'd rather not let the number of threads fall as low as 5, maybe 10 would be more appropriate. Established articles tend to have shorter threads, and letting these sit on the talk page for a long time allows editors to see consensus on the most relevant topics, without resulting in excessively long talk pages: effectively the talk page is a FAQ. While it's sometimes advisable to read, or at least look at, archives, in general it's not something we can expect most editors to do most of the time. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 00:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC).[reply]
Your explanation makes sense. Will adjust the archiving. Thanks - Shearonink (talk) 01:22, 8 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Most murders

[edit]

Hi, I am trying to understand your reasons for creating the article about most murders back on 29 June 2025. None of your edit summaries meaningfully explain your edits, so I have no idea of your reasons for creating this article. Also, many of your edits are marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. One of your edits removed a proposal for speedy deletion, without explaining why you are opposed to the article being deleted. While another reverted a blank and redirect to murder, again without explanation. Based on its current content, most of the existing article content is probably off-topic, and I have added clean-up tags to suggesting better locations for most of this content, but I would welcome you sharing your opinion at Talk:Most murders. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 21:38, 7 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

See talk page for discussions about the content page. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 19:57, 9 March 2026 (UTC).[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary 722

[edit]

Tech News: 2026-11

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:51, 9 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 March 2026

[edit]
  • Special report: What actually happened during the Wikimedia security incident?
    A horrifying exploit took place, which could have had catastrophic and far-reaching consequences if used maliciously; instead, it seems to have happened by accident and was used for childish vandalism. How did this happen, and what did the script actually do?