User talk:Harringstars

October 2025

Hello, I'm LakesideMiners. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:Evan Y. O'Neill have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. LakesideMiners^{Come Talk To Me!} 19:19, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

gg 0̵̨̳̈́1̸̮̈́ Harringstars 0̵̨̳̈́1̸̮̈́ 19:53, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edits you made did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

or in the visual editor:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Describe what you changed

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 18:48, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not all edits need a summary, also, i know how to add a summary. 🐟 Harringstars 🐟 20:36, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If an admin is providing this message, it means one of your edits was not clear due to the lack of the edit summary. – The Grid (talk) 21:48, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nintendo Switch without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 17:53, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i didnt remove any content, i did the opposite Harringstars ᐸ Talk
Contribs 18:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Paper9oll: i was adding a hatnote but the editor glitched out and removed a lot of content, im sorry Harringstars ᐸ Talk
Contribs 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Harringstars The diff indicates otherwise. Regardless, please use either the "Show preview" or "Show changes" button to vet through your edits before clicking the "Publish changes" button moving forward. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 18:39, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Harringstars, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 20:00, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the delicious cookies 0̵̨̳̈́1̸̮̈́ Harringstars 0̵̨̳̈́1̸̮̈́ 20:02, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Haddon Township, New Jersey

Hi! I'm reaching out to let you know that your reversion to Haddon Township, New Jersey, while done in good faith, was not reverting vandalism. The IP editor (who I believe made a new account @WestmontFire151) was boldly making a good faith edit without a source, which I have found and added to the article. Ultraviolet is a powerful tool which I use as well, but using "vandalism" as the reason for the revert when the edit is not clearly vandalism "may harm the encyclopedia by alienating or driving away potential editors." Thanks and have a good day! md m.b la 17:14, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sorry i accidentally said it was vandalism instead of "factual errors", but now i realized it wasnt a factual error 🐟 Harringstars 🐟 17:17, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Hi, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. I would recommend that you please read through Wikipedia policy before you continue using tools like Twinkle, and I'd also recommend doing more actual editing to the encyclopedia itself (as it stands, 8 of your 95 edits have been to the main namespace, with the majority being devoted to your user page.) Anti-vandalism work and improvements to Wikipedia overall are welcome, but your edits so far (e.g. this discussion on uw-hoax and this requested move on Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder) have been somewhat disruptive and show a misunderstanding with how certain policies work. Thank you. Neo Purgatorio (pester!) 21:55, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes for AFD - do not create any more deletion nominations until you understand notability and deletion policy much better. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creeper (Minecraft) (3rd nomination) shows a complete lack of understanding of both. Sergecross73 msg me 16:28, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok im sorry Harringstars ᐸ Talk
Contribs 16:35, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! It's fine, we all make mistakes. Just know, bringing external wikis to an AfD is absolutely useless. Yes, the Minecraft wiki has a page, but that's irrelevant to Wikipedia. Also, articles are judged on notability, and Creeper definitely fits the bill! You might want to start participating in AfD discussions rather than nominating since you've just started, but that's just a personal recommendation. Welcome :) jolielover♥talk 17:28, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now how do i close the Harringstars ᐸ Talk
Contribs 17:49, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, somebody else will come along and close it. jolielover♥talk 17:54, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

it was closed. Harringstars ᐸ Talk
Contribs 18:39, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've started another deletion discussion, with a confusing rationale, despite you just agreeing not to. Please stop rushing into all these things without knowing what to do, or your account is going to get restricted from editing these areas, or worse, blocked. Please just focus on learning what the basics are first. Sergecross73 msg me 19:21, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

it IS a valid rationale Harringstars ᐸ Talk
Contribs 19:44, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is the rationale? And what policy or guideline are you citing or basing it off of? Sergecross73 msg me 21:19, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Its already been WP:SNOW closed as keep. Not good. Okay, at first, it was just advice, but now, its a warning: any more bad deletion nominations or similar sort of jumping into venues that you clearly don't understand yet, and your account is going to be temporarily blocked from editing. Sergecross73 msg me 15:39, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

but cant we make a wikipedia article for these type of things? an encyclopedia and a species directory are two different things Harringstars ᐸ Talk
Contribs 16:57, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's not the issue here. The issue is that you erroneously nominated another thing for deletion with invalid deletion rationale. Whether or not it could have its own article has no bearing on whether or not that template should be deleted. You don't got to "templates for deletion" and ask "Hey can we create an article on this?". That doesn't make any sort of sense to do. Sergecross73 msg me 18:18, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

I am once again reverting your mage addition, and advise you to seek aid in deleting the image you uploaded. The crewmate adds no value to the article. Per WP:NFCC; Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding., which in my opinion nulls the image. Readers aren't suffering any information besides decoration by having the png of a crewmate. In terms of images, there's already the image right below it, which shows a crewmate, a dead crewmate, and a location, making the image you uploaded practically pointless. Babysharkb☩ss2 I am Thou, Thou art I 17:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red Among Us.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Red Among Us.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Babysharkb☩ss2 I am Thou, Thou art I 18:01, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Red Among Us.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Red Among Us.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:45, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They wont let me use it in the article Among Us Harringstars ᐸ Talk
Contribs 07:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October '25

I have removed [[File:Red Among Us.png]] from your userbox. You may not use any NF image in any userbox, per WP:UBX. Especially if said image is within the realm of being possibly deleted. Babysharkb☩ss2 I am Thou, Thou art I 16:12, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Hi, your signature, as used here and elsewhere, contains a parser function - specifically, {{=}} - in contravention of WP:SIG#NT. Please amend the signature accordingly, it should be as simple as replacing

<small style{{=}}display:inline-block;line-height:9px;vertical-align:-3px>

with

<small style="display:inline-block;line-height:9px;vertical-align:-3px">

Note that the quotemarks are mandatory for a style= attribute. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:47, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LTA

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:44, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is either Your Local Italian or 14 novembre, it really dones't matter which.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:44, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]