User talk:Gwanghao

August 2023

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 13:40, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence for the claims put forward in the article , there is really no reason for them to be still there. It just helps the spread of misinformation. Gwanghao (talk) 13:43, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 02:36, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence for the claims put forward in the article , there is really no reason for them to be still there. It just helps the spread of misinformation. Gwanghao (talk) 17:42, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 21:00, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You keep removing referenced material without any discussion beyond an edit summary. You are expected to explain why on talkpages, especially when you are removing referenced information. Acroterion (talk) 21:02, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Hindu Shahis, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TrangaBellam (talk) 09:38, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, as you did to Paranormal. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you. - LuckyLouie (talk) 22:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Biased claims supported by no evidence have no place in Wikipedia. Gwanghao (talk) 23:40, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Constantine Samuel Rafinesque, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. If you disagree with the sources cited in an article the solution is not to simply edit or remove information without a source. You need to show they are wrong by citing other secondary sources. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 05:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 16:21, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]