User talk:GrapeIdea123

March 2025

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:29, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GrapeIdea123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’mm not a sock puppet . The user who blocked me did not follow Wikipedia blocking policies and they kept it very vague. Plus, there is no evidence that I’m a sock puppet and and they didn’t talk to other ambassadors about it. So I must be unblocked because it violated Wikipedia blocking policies. According to the policies, it must be revealed that through evidence that it’s a sock puppet. I am not a sock puppet, and my real name is Cindy S.GrapeIdea123 (talk) 16:41, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yeah, this is pretty obvious socking if you know where to look. Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:44, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Technical data is not particularly helpful in this case. The block should be reviewed on behavioural evidence. I have no idea what GrapeIdea123 is talking about when they refer to ambassadors. --Yamla (talk) 16:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

GrapeIdea123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You guys don’t have any evidence that I’m a sock puppet and you should unblocked me if you don’t have evidence because I’m Cindy S Garcia and I have been treated unfairly ever since you blocked me . I don’t know who you think. I’m a sock puppet of, but you guys clearly need some evidence.GrapeIdea123 (talk) 20:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=You guys don’t have any evidence that I’m a sock puppet and you should unblocked me if you don’t have evidence because I’m Cindy S Garcia and I have been treated unfairly ever since you blocked me . I don’t know who you think. I’m a sock puppet of, but you guys clearly need some evidence.[[User:GrapeIdea123|GrapeIdea123]] ([[User talk:GrapeIdea123#top|talk]]) 20:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=You guys don’t have any evidence that I’m a sock puppet and you should unblocked me if you don’t have evidence because I’m Cindy S Garcia and I have been treated unfairly ever since you blocked me . I don’t know who you think. I’m a sock puppet of, but you guys clearly need some evidence.[[User:GrapeIdea123|GrapeIdea123]] ([[User talk:GrapeIdea123#top|talk]]) 20:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=You guys don’t have any evidence that I’m a sock puppet and you should unblocked me if you don’t have evidence because I’m Cindy S Garcia and I have been treated unfairly ever since you blocked me . I don’t know who you think. I’m a sock puppet of, but you guys clearly need some evidence.[[User:GrapeIdea123|GrapeIdea123]] ([[User talk:GrapeIdea123#top|talk]]) 20:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}