User talk:GloriousFigure

April 2025

Hello. Your recent edit to 2012 appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 18:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added the source. GloriousFigure (talk) 19:15, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2012 Heliopolis Palace incident has been accepted

2012 Heliopolis Palace incident, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 00:17, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since ancient times - how do we know?

Saw your addition "Sham Ennesim is celebrated in Egypt since ancient times." - would like for that to be true, but is there any actual proof for this? Like a description in Egyptian or, for example, Greek sources of a festival that has similar characteristics? I've seen the assertion on a lot of websites, but a lot of them also talk about a 'shemu' or "shamo" festival that - AFAIK - did not exist. So, if that part is wishful thinking, I would want to see a better source. MikuChan39 (talk) 01:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cairo Metro Line 4 (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cairo Metro Line 4 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:46, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GloriousFigure! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:46, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cairo Metro Line 4 (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cairo Metro Line 4 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 09:27, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You need to be more particular please. GloriousFigure (talk) 11:04, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed Reda (Egyptian footballer) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ahmed Reda (Egyptian footballer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:37, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But Ahmed Reda is really an Egyptian footballer who plays at Al Ahly sir/Mam. I will the references I promise. GloriousFigure (talk) 18:38, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You need to be adding sources before you publish the article Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:20, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Suez Emergency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free Officers Movement. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:03, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahmed Reda (Egyptian footballer) (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Transfermarkt is not an acceptable source. Al Ahly's website is not an independent source so does not confer notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ahmed Reda (Egyptian footballer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:40, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Presidential Police (Egypt) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Presidential Police (Egypt). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:31, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Presidential Police (Egypt) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Presidential Police (Egypt). Thanks! Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:31, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi GloriousFigure. Thank you for your work on Suez Emergency. Another editor, Noleander, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

This topic of this article is a notable subject, but the article needs more details.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Noleander (talk) 17:13, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You add the details I just can’t do everything. You research and add since a “wiki” can be edited by anyone. Please not that this is Nothing personal

have a great day GloriousFigure (talk) 17:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note* GloriousFigure (talk) 17:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2013 Kuwait protests moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2013 Kuwait protests. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 19:40, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello GloriousFigure! Your additions to Suez Emergency have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 02:36, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cairo Metro Line 4 (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Moritoriko was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the sources are independent of the project. Arabic sources that are secondary and independent are okay!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cairo Metro Line 4 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Moritoriko (talk) 04:12, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Thanks for contributing to the article MI6. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 14:16, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Suez Emergency

Hello GloriousFigure,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Suez Emergency, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at Suez Crisis. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slatersteven (talk) 09:37, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir, thank you for your kind words may god bless you, your family and friends

But the Suez Emergency is different than the Suez crisis. Look, Suez Emergency refers to the period of attacks on British soldiers by Egyptian nationalists in the period between 1951-56 particularly after the abrogation of the 1936 Anglo-Egyptian treaty by the Wafdist government of Mustafa Al Nahas to the final withdrawal of British troops in accordance to the 1954 Anglo-Egyptian evacuation agreement

The Suez crisis refers to the Anglo-French-Israeli invasion of Egypt following Nasser’s nationalization of the Suez Canal. So you Mr. Slatersteven, the Suez emergency events is totally different than the suez crisis sir. GloriousFigure (talk) 09:41, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The place for this discussion is the article talk page. Slatersteven (talk) 09:43, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove this tag leave it to an uninvolved admin to decide. You can make a case on the talk pages as to why it should not be deleted. Slatersteven (talk) 09:41, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Slatersteven (talk) 09:43, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]