User talk:Getafix42

Disruptive editing

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Bhakt , did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:26, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bhakt. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:30, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bhakt, you may be blocked from editing. Re-adding unsourced information is considered disruptive editing, please #2 at WP:DISRUPTSIGNS Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:37, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The term Bhakt should not redirect to Bhakti, the meaning is not synonomous. Your reverts appear to be politically motivated and any further attempts to remove the article will be reported. I am undoing your vandalism, so please indicate which sections, sentences you require better references and help improve this article, rather than engage in mass deletion Getafix42 (talk) 14:44, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bhakt.

April 2025

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bhakt. Bongan^® →TalkToMe← 15:00, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]