User talk:FoscaF

AfC notification: Draft:Teisseire has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Teisseire. Thanks! /wia /tlk 17:08, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teisseire (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Teisseire and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teisseire (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RadioFan was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Teisseire and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RadioFan (talk) 18:02, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! FoscaF, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! RadioFan (talk) 18:02, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teisseire (company)

Hello FoscaF. As you can see, I have moved your draft into article space after considerable copyediting and the addition of multiple references per the discussion at the Tea House. I have disambiguated the title to Teisseire (company) to distinguish it from the cyclist Lucien Teisseire and an eventual article on Camille Teisseire. Since you have declared that you are a paid editor on behalf of this company/brand, I strongly suggest that you refrain from directly editing the article further. Instead, suggest any additions or corrections at Talk:Teisseire (company). I have the page on my watchlist. Best, wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 13:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]