User talk:Flavoredquark
Appearance
February 2025
[edit] Hello, I'm BilCat. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Georgia (U.S. state) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 02:51, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- How is correcting a typo not constructive? Flavoredquark (talk) 08:15, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- The sentence is barely intelligible in English, as it stands Flavoredquark (talk) 08:26, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
Vietcong
[edit]Read MOS:LEADCITE. Mztourist (talk) 05:59, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Understood. Given that rule, the sentence ought to be outside of the leading section because (1) it isn't essential to the definition of VC, (2) it really deserves citation due to the political and interpretive reasons originally stated. Flavoredquark (talk) 06:24, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- No, read WP:LEAD for what lede is intended to cover. Mztourist (talk) 10:20, 18 June 2025 (UTC)