User talk:Fibonacci89~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello, Fibonacci89, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Blood Diamond (film). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Tito Dutta ✉ 15:07, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you Tito, but all I did was some minor correction. :) In the future, I hope I could be of better service to the community. :) Cheers,

Fibonacci89 (talk) 18:21, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

List of longest films by running time

Hi. The section about films released in separate parts is not intended for film series. We (including you if you wish to contribute of course) have not yet formulated the correct text for an introduction for that section, see Talk:List of longest films by running time#Criteria for films released in separate parts where I already mentioned Star Wars as another counterexample without anybody disagreeing. Harry Potter has already been added and removed again. I will remove these latest additions. Please join the conversation there if you wish. Please also have a look at WP:BRD if you have not already, this (bold change, revert, discuss) is a widely followed practice. --Mirokado (talk) 20:02, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Maybe the problem is with me then if I think about the Harry Potter and Star Wars sagas as a whole...

Besides this, I think it couldn't hurt anybody, if that section were for trilogies, sagas too... Most people who look for film-length considers the above mentioned sagas as ONE whole... At least most of the ones I know...

If it won't be extended, then you'll surely be able to manage things without me, as you did so far. :) Cheers, Fibonacci89 (talk)

Hi again. (If you will forgive me I have reformatted your reply to illustrate how we normally structure conversations. Indenting like this makes conversations more readable, at least once you have got used to it, and this is particularly important when taking part in longer conversations so it is well worth getting used to doing it. Details at WP:INDENT).

Adding a section for separately released films (somebody else did that incidentally) is a concession which was always going to raise questions about what counts and what does not. LOTR was (eventually) conceived as a trilogy and the three parts were produced simultaneously. The production of the SW and HP films was by no means simultaneous and thus they don't give the same impression of a single flowing production (I have seen all three in single massive sessions). The danger would be that the genuinely united sets of films which are in some way equivalent to a single film would be drowned out by James Bond and countless other franchises unless we have a fairly strict criterion for inclusion. --Mirokado (talk) 20:49, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Suggesting again a new section for sagas. In a brand-new List of longest films by running (film series) could be a solution... James Bond films do suit the criteria: They are A film series (sort of), they were written almost entirely from an Ian Fleming book/novel/etc... Regardless of the timespan when they were made, they could be considered as one series... At least I don't handle them separetly. :) Fibonacci89 (talk) 21:02, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

No objection at all to a list of longest film series, but I would honestly prefer to retain the single-film concept for the current list. It may be that there is already something suitable (no idea I'm afraid). Have you come across WikiProjects yet? You could join WP:FILM... Please see Wikipedia:Film#Participants if you are interested. If you can't find a suitable list, I suggest you ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film where you will hopefully get reactions etc from more that just myself! --Mirokado (talk) 21:24, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Fibonacci89. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Fibonacci89~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

23:54, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

12:53, 22 April 2015 (UTC)